Pray for patience and the universe will give you more opportunities to be patient. Pray for love and a higher consciousness in the world and the universe will present you with opportunities to be love and express that higher consciousness.

Yesterday, I was given that opportunity and I failed.
It was a doozy, folks. I made a comment in response to a guest post at Writer Dad and was blasted by the author, Rita. Here is the exchange.
“6. “We are a community.”
It is true – we are, in many ways, a community. Like a High School class is a community. I bought into that game in blogging, and sold too much of myself for a piece of the action; for just as we are a community, we are also competitors.
Bloggers want to be “A+” bloggers, and the way to do that is to insulate yourself so much that the same group of bloggers read and comment with the same group of bloggers. Read the names of the top 10 commenters on the blogs you visit; chances are, most are the same. Bloggers WANT to be seen with the “big blogs” so that, in many cases, the others on the “big blog” lists will come to them. Community or competition?”
-Excerpt from entry
Hayden Tompkins:
“The ceremony itself didn’t matter…none of us planned on attending, as there was a new movie opening that night, and we all wanted to see the movie instead.”
LMAO!!!! I wouldn’t have attended my graduation if my mom hadn’t ambushed me by flying in from Texas. [sigh]
SOOOO. About the ‘popular crowd’. The ‘cool kids’. I did not get this memo. What gives? Who is in it? I’m probably the loner in the corner wearing all black and scribbling in her notebook. Viva le artiste!
Rita:
Other than throwing a few of my words back at me, I have NO idea what you’re talking about – or why you commented…sorry.
Hayden:
Er.
Well, I found amusement in your graduation story. Shared mine. Then asked a question about your point number 6. The[n] made a goofy comment.
So…er, I guess I won’t be commenting on anything you write.
Rita:
I don’t believe that Writer Dad disagrees with many commenters. I am not Writer Dad. I went back and re-read your post. It addressed none of the issues in my blog – except for an introductory paragraph. Your “question on #6″ was incomprehensible to me.
And your second attempt to “clarify” only brought more attention to self-aggrandizement than any point mentioned in the blog. Hence, you and I are in total agreement: you won’t be commenting on anything I write. Somehow I don’t think that will cause me a moment’s of lost sleep.
Writer Dad:
Hayden was being playful with you, as is her nature.
LMAO stands for laughing my ass off. She thought it was funny that you didn’t want to go to your graduation, and then related a story of her own. She too didn’t want attend her graduation, and wouldn’t had she not been ambushed by her mom. The second part of her comment is her saying that she doesn’t even know who is in the popular crowd because she’s off in her corner doing her own thing. This is in line with you saying you’re finding interesting people to sit with.
Rita:
@ Writer Dad:
I know that LMAO means. I know what LMAOAPOTF means. I know what BRB means. I also know what LMAOACFI means. I don’t need translations, thanks. This is your blog, and for that reason only do I apologize – to you – for upsetting one of your readers.
Hayden wrote the type of comment that I didn’t find contributed to much of the conversation, and then came back and did the same. These are the types of “comments” that I, personally, find pointless. They are self-aggrandizing. So, given that I’ve been “socializing” on the computer just a few more years than you have, here’s one for you: CYB!
Writer Dad:
I only know the first one. None of the others. Hayden’s comment made me laugh, and that was enough of a contribution for me. Apologies aren’t necessary. Good communication is about discovering what makes others tick.
Rita:
@ WRITER DAD and Everyone,
Thank you for allowing me to share my thoughts with you today. Whether you agree or disagree, I have found this to be an incredibly positive experience., with an excellent comment thread. Writer Dad, I “heart” you as well; clearly, so do your readers. Thank you for opening your blog – and your heart to me.
To everyone: Namaste.
Rita
Dave Fowler:
Rita, I’ve got to tell you I’m disappointed at the stance you’ve taken here. Not in your article but in your response to comments. You’ve set out the rules for engaging Rita and the bar is set pretty high – many people won’t be able to reach it on a consistent basis and by default they’ll be excluded.
It’s back to High School again.
You can be a prickly character Rita and that is some of your appeal without a doubt, but I didn’t like the way you were so dismissive of Hayden, it was totally unnecessary and I think you should have taken the time to understand. If you really didn’t care for what was said, you could have overlooked it.
Now I’ve seen enough death and misery to last me a lifetime which is why I often adopt a light-hearted way to express myself. So I like the people who chip in with something short and sweet. They show their support by their presence. Some people reach out for the first time by saying ‘great stuff’ or ‘love your website’, it doesn’t automatically mean they’re spammers. Why can’t they be given the benefit of the doubt?
If I was at a party and someone said, “Hi, that’s a great shirt you’re wearing.” I wouldn’t ignore them because they had nothing of substance to say, and I certainly would admonish them for having the ‘nerve’ to speak to me.
If people aren’t overtly destructive, what does it really matter? And yes, sometimes people forget, sometimes people make mistakes, sometimes people over commit for all the right reasons and just end up getting it wrong. It’s not the end of the world.
Like you, I’m not particularly fond of reading bad grammar or poor spelling, but as I’m far from perfect I do try to look past it and enjoy the message.
I’m sorry but I didn’t enjoy this exchange.
Rita, I enjoy what you write, I enjoy your wit, your dry sense of humour. I enjoy the fact that you are intellectually my superior but I don’t always enjoy the way you ‘speak’ to people.
Sorry to put a dampener on things but it was important to me to say this.
I hope you understand.
All the best, Dave.
Blogger Dad:
Dave Fowler – Well said. I, too, was surprised by Rita’s comments to Hayden, who is among the top commenters on this site. I believe that Writer Dad responded well by taking the time to attempt to explain the situation to Rita on the off chance that she misinterpreted Hayden’s intent.
I’ve seen many a misunderstandings start small and blow up (sort of like high school drama, eh?) and I firmly believe that all problems between people can be resolved through discussion. Writer Dad’s comment allowed Rita both a chance to retract her comment and to save face, after having had some time to think about it. More surprisingly, Rita turned down the opportunity and instead took a second unwarranted shot at Hayden.
I know Rita via our blogs and our brief collaboration, I respect Rita, and I like Rita. I don’t know Hayden at all, but I’m with Dave on this one. I hope that Rita hasn’t scared Hayden or others from leaving comments in this community which has handles past controversy in a very thoughtful manner with respect on all sides.
Rita:
@ Dave and Writer Dad,
Thank you for your opinions – they were well stated, and taught me something about myself. I have been thinking about this situation all night. Yes, I was too rough on Hayden, a woman I don’t know – and I apologize to everyone who was offended.
“Sensitivity” is not my strong suit at times. If I had to do it again, here is what I would do: I would have kept my first comment in place, as I had NO idea what Hayden was talking about. And I should have just IGNORED the second comment- something I am loathe to do. But yes, admonishing somebody CAN be hurtful – and I did not mean my remarks to be hurtful, but to make a point.
I don’t know Hayden. I apologize if I “hurt” Hayden. And I will say it straight out: Hayden, I am sorry.
That being said, I went through the entire comment thread a number of times. I would say that I agreed with, or comlimented well over 95% of commenters. I disagreed with two. I don’t necessarily agree that that shows a lack of respect. The point of the blog was mani-fold, but clearly a large issue was on “leaving comments.” Since you know Hayden, as does Writer Dad, I missed the “sense of humor” in her comments. I still do. You both know that I can be as “silly” as the next person. Hayden’s comments were totally lost on me.
I apologize for offending. Dave, I am far from your “intellectual superior,” and that is a label I will not be pasted with – even in jest. And Blogger Dad, my “second shot” was more toward Writer Dad than toward Hayden. He and I have discussed it, moved on and made peace. What I should NOT have done is USE Hayden to take that shot at Writer Dad on his own blog. However, it is not the first shot I have taken at him – nor do I expect it will be the last. As Sean exlained in his introduction, we DO disagree at times – and we learn and move on – and we have.
I hope that the two of you will be able to do the same as well. I should have remained silent on the second comment. Often, as I have said, silence speaks louder than words. THAT is the error that I regret, and hope that I can be forgiven for.
Dave Fowler:
Hi Rita,
I hadn’t expected you to come back with this and I imagined I’d be off your Christmas card list forever. I underestimated you and I’m sorry for that.
I didn’t mean to patronise you with my remark about being ‘intellectually superior’, nor did I intend to belittle myself. I didn’t express myself very well.
You’re clearly educated and intelligent (although I base that predominantly on assumption rather than direct knowledge) and I’ve found over the years that it can be quite daunting to hold a conversation with someone who has a keen mind and an articulate expression. I have also been witness to plenty of intellectual snobbery throughout my life and I was worried that you had no time for those less able (or less willing) to engage in cerebral chess matches.
And, Hayden, none of what I say here is aimed at you, I’m speaking merely in general terms now. ![]()
Rita, I honestly believe we can move on, and happily too.
I bear no grudge or resentment. On the contrary I admire you for being willing to re-examine your position and thinking. Were more people able to do the same, the world would doubtless be a better place.
Thanks Rita, you’ve made me smile again – as you often do.
Hayden Tompkins:
@Rita
You’ve never been to my blog, that I am aware, and so I know you have no idea about ‘what I’m about’.
The cliff’s note version is that I focus on love and community, facing negativity with the courage to be as fully loving as possible. Yesterday, I failed.
My initial response was “Who the hell does she think she is?” But, because I deeply respect Sean, I would never have written that. But I was apalled at the tone of your responses to anyone’s comment that YOU thought ‘didn’t measure up’.
And then when you closed with “I have found this to be an incredibly positive experience…Thank you for opening your blog – and your heart to me. To everyone: Namaste.” I almost had a heart attack. Did you not even notice the vitriol you were spewing??
But as I read your comments, I realized that something very specific about my comment had ticked you off – your perception of my ’self-aggrandizing’. That was what put your feathers up.
So, Rita. I don’t know what your story is, or why you are so sensitive to perceived intellectual inferiority or self-aggrandizing behavior, but it doesn’t matter. I am going to tell you what I should have told you yesterday.
Dear Rita, I was only trying to share in response to what you had shared. I didn’t understand that you didn’t want the bloggers version of ’support’, rather an analysis of your points.
Also, I really don’t know who the cool kids are and in which ‘area’ these kids are. An example or two would be awesome.
Now, personally, my high school years were horrible. I was friends with every group but I was always, always an outsider. How can you relate to people who are going through ‘regular stuff’ when you are coming home to abuse everynight? When your father tries to kill you and you end up in a foster home.
Dear Rita, I was not trying to be ’self-important’. I was attempting to make light of a very painful time in my life. A time when I cared nothing for the ‘cool crowd’ and only for the people, my stalwart friends, who were there for me in spite of everything.
Friends, Rita, to me are everything. Friends like Writer Dad who are so unstintingly supportive and loving. We are nothing if not for our friends.
And so, I’ll say thank you. Thank you for giving me this opportunity to ‘practice what I preach’. Love in the face of negativity. Just when I think I have learned that lesson, I get a chance to be the change I want to see in the world.
To you,
Namaste
P.S. Writer Dad, Dave Fowler, and Blogger Dad – From the bottom of my heart, thank you.





25 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 24, 2008 at 3:11 pm
jimsmuse
Freakin’ wow!
I think you handled the whole situation pretty well…and it seems that the outcome was mostly positive on all sides. I applaud you for standing up for yourself without being as nasty about it as I’m sure you were inclined to be.
I think you’ve also given everyone who reads this a lot to think about in terms of the “blogosphere” in general, how people perceive comments on their own sites, and the types of comments that they themselves leave on other sites.
Because I know from reading your blog and from our interactions how important other people are to you, the exchange above must have made for a pretty rough day on your part — and yet you’re willing to put it out there for all of us to take a look at in the hopes it might help someone else.
This is why I think you’re awesome. (Oh, and I like your shirt!)
hayden tompkins says:
More and more I beginning to be convinced that a lot of conflict in this country is caused by a misunderstanding of values. In this case, her value of ‘meaningful discourse’ and mine of ‘interconnectivity’ were completely at odds.
It can be hard to write a blog post with no comments or feedback. People like to feel their voice is being heard, that they are making an impact. When an article that you have slaved over drops into the well of digital silence, it can be disheartening.
That’s why I make a point to show people support – to show my appreciation or enjoyment of their story.
That is, as you pointed out, my personal perception. Time and time again I have to remind myself that just because I think something is so, doesn’t make it so. I’ll be more circumspect in my commenting from now on, I assure you.
October 24, 2008 at 3:11 pm
mssc54
“Yesterday, I was given that opportunity and I failed.”
Is it REALLY failure if you realize you’ve failed?
Man I love a good cat fight! lol
hayden tompkins says:
You would!
October 24, 2008 at 3:53 pm
curlywurlygurly
hayden…i was so surprised by this that i went over to rita’s blog and writer dad’s just to get a sense of what happened. i was compelled to leave a comment on writer dad’s blog, not because i think it will change rita’s behavior or actions, but because i wouldn’t stand idly by and watch anyone cut down another student (or friend).
though i’m not as eloquent as some other posters, what i said came from my heart:
i’ve spent the last ten years working in a high school which has afforded me an opportunity to observe interactions between teenagers. it’s disheartening to see that behavior patterns don’t really change that much after graduation.
why cut down someone who’s just trying to add his or her thoughts or perspective? people often try to identify with others by relating their own stories on a topic–it’s a way to build a sense of community.
i don’t always understand what my students are saying, but i don’t dismiss them or make them feel small by saying i have no idea what they are talking about. if i (or you) can’t understand what someone is saying, maybe we need to listen better or ask for clarification in a friendly, non-threatening way.
hayden tompkins says:
Wow, Curly, thank you. I so appreciate your support. Your students don’t know it, but they are DAMN LUCKY. It was teachers like you that made high school more than bearable.
October 24, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Writer Dad
CurlyWurlyGurly: I appreciated your comment. Thanks, and well said.
Hayden: Great job using words as cliff notes to replay the day. Discussion is healthy, and helps us all to grow.
hayden tompkins says:
Now, to work on writing comments that aren’t incomprehensible!
October 24, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Amber
Hayden, cyberspace I have found to be just like the real world. There are those out there who will just simply rub us the wrong way.
I have wondered many times about how people get into these crazy things. I guess its all about perception and perspective. Sometimes people dig themselves in a hole and they become then defensive and go on the offense. That is clearly what this woman did. How sad that she is not mature enough to step back and stop while she is behind.
Great writing.. and a great lesson. *hugs to you gf* The people who know what you are about… know. Who cares about the rest?
hayden tompkins says:
True that. I have to remember that not everyone is as awesome as you are!
October 24, 2008 at 8:02 pm
vanessaleighsblog
Hayden: I want to say: Kudos…. because you were willing to walk the walk, and make your intentions clearly known. For me, I just want to write, and hope that those in the world that read what I write find it useful, helpful, and enlightening. I am not looking for critical feedback or meaningful dialogue; if it comes, so be it. I want to stir it up and change people’s lives…. for the better……
You go girl!!! And, by the way, I feel like I have not been able to read anybody in ages, but I WILL be back…. sending you a warm hug, Vanessa
hayden tompkins says:
It should be no chore, we’ll be here.
October 24, 2008 at 8:09 pm
SanityFound
Holy Crapola gf all I can say is you are the better person, seriously and lesson indeed… thank you for sharing it with us so that we too can learn.
hayden tompkins says:
I’m sure I could have written some other post, but it seems the lesson of the day would not be ignored. Anything else would have had no fire behind it.
October 24, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Blogger Dad
Hayden – Ditto what Writer Dad said. And despite the way things started, I feel that they ended well enough. In any event, it’s given me an opportunity to get to know a little bit about you. I like what I see and will be subscribing to your blog.
dave
hayden tompkins says:
Welcome! Challenges can bring us together and I think, in this case, it did.
October 24, 2008 at 8:35 pm
originalpurity
God Evening Hayden,
What an interesting exchange and one that demonstrates our ability to forget ourselves in the moment – As a favoured speaker of mine ‘Wayne Dyer’ says – we must be vigilant to catch our selves at the point of behavour.
In its simplest form this comes to us in the old addage of counting from ten backwards – before responding or acting.
Personally I am at about the 50 mark – which is quite some progress as I used to be at the 100 mark
Can I mention one other note – I have never laughed my ass off (lmao) which is very interesting terminology…and would leave one in some serious predicaments I would think.
Be blessed, Kal
“Constant Vigilance!” Prof Moody HPatGoF
hayden tompkins says:
Oh, my literal friend, you are very wise. No one would wish you so disfigured!
October 24, 2008 at 9:41 pm
Tara@From Dawn Till Rusk
Hey Hayden
I’ve just come over from Writer Dad’s were I’ve been reading the whole car crash!
I have to say I was quite disappointed by Rita’s handling of some of the comments – not just yours – as it did come over as rather elitist and ‘this is how I think blogs and comments should be don’.
The trouble is that when writing a comment you can never get a sense of the emotions in the words or the where emphasis lies and these little misunderstandings can lead to, well to what happened there!
I must say I really agreed with Dave Fowler’s comment that it doesn’t matter what sort of comment a person leaves, short or long and verbose, we are all a community and we are all supporting each other and to say ‘you should only comment as I say’ I find a bit rude.
and look at that, I’ve rambled on here now when all I wanted to do was to come over and say don’t take it to heart!
hayden tompkins says:
Not at all, your thesis was balm to a wounded spirit and wonderfullly supportive!
I will say I find it interesting that someone would essentially say, “Don’t waste my time with fluff, since I would rather spend it arguing.” Different folks, I guess.
October 24, 2008 at 11:50 pm
Barbara Swafford
Hi Hayden,
Consider the confrontation (?) a blessing. I follow Writer Dad’s blog, and it was from your comments I found you.
Your heart is in the right place, and I feel like I’ve just made a new cyberspace friend. I’ll be back later to read more of your writings.
I’m subscribing.
hayden tompkins says:
Thank you!
Ok, I don’t know how to tell you this, Barbara, but I was just over there and you are apparently next.
I’m very sorry.
October 25, 2008 at 3:23 am
Curlywurlygurly
i agree with tara…i was going to mention in my original comment that the internet may be great for communication but it can make communication more difficult. how? because when people communicate online they lose body language and tone of voice. sarcasm or joking snarkiness doesn’t always play well because i might not read what a person wrote in the tone they intended.
on my blog i find that people who know me in real life laugh at my writing more than my ‘online friends’ because they can imagine me telling the stories, using my voice and gestures. it’s a fine line between being snarky and being snappy.
hayden tompkins says:
True. I know that people hate emoticons but I like having a way to indicate that I am joking. Hail to the winky face!
October 25, 2008 at 3:50 am
Breanna
that was quite an exchange, and not the intellectual jolt I expected in an early morning blog read. it was however, very enlightening for multiple reasons. I won’t go into those, but I do want to comment on
“Time and time again I have to remind myself that just because I think something is so, doesn’t make it so”
I’m reminded of the platinum rule, that I only just learned from my boss a few years ago and wish I had known long before. Often we want to follow the golden rule – “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”. We so often forget that what we want, however, isn’t what someone else would want. This could be as simple as an accolade – if you want to say job well done and give someone public praise who is truly mortified of being identified in public, you’re doing harm more than anything, rather than what you had hoped would make them happy. (I’m sure there’s a better way to state that, but I can’t think how at the moment.) So a rule that is more universal would be the platinum rule: “Do unto others as they would have you to do unto them.”
hayden tompkins says:
For some reason, your platinum rule (which is AWESOME) reminds me of “The 5 Languages of Love”. So if someone’s ‘love language’ is Quality Time and their partner keeps giving them gifts, they will not feel loved. There is a very deep truth in the Platinum Rule.
October 25, 2008 at 12:42 pm
jimsmuse
@Brenna Well said! You are right that how you would like to be treated is not necessarily how everyone else wants to be treated.
hayden tompkins says:
I JUST got the t-shirt comment. [smacks forehead] Duh!
October 25, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Dereck
Wow…
hayden tompkins says:
No kidding!
October 25, 2008 at 9:24 pm
Michelle
Holy Blog Drama BatMan! I cant think of anything intelligent to write in response! I think you handled it in a suberb way!
hayden tompkins says:
Well, I do eventually learn from my mistakes. I did get huffy once (a while back regarding another blog) and didn’t feel good about the results at all. I am just glad that I got as much support as I did!
October 25, 2008 at 10:27 pm
Pace
@Hayden’s reply to Breanna: IMO, that deep truth is the usual error. Assuming that others are like you, that they want the same things, and so on. It’s the same with the love languages. By default, people make the usual error and assume that their partners have the same love language they do. Funny, I was just writing a book on this the other day, and here it pops up again. (;
Miscommunication is so easy, especially via text, especially especially with people you don’t know. Kudos for you for sticking with the communication and understanding process.
hayden tompkins says:
Is that the ‘usual error’ that you named your site after?
October 26, 2008 at 11:34 am
Dave Fowler
Hi Hayden, I’m popping in to let you know I enjoyed reading your response to Rita. It was well thought out and nicely expressed. You weren’t patronising and your words came across as being very genuine. You made it about you and not about Rita – You came away from that ugly scene with your head held high, and rightly so. I admire you for that.
I was hoping after what you’d said it would all be forgotten but clearly that hasn’t been the case (given the additions to the comments).
All the best.
Dave
hayden tompkins says:
It’s been a learning experience to say the least. And I am pretty sure that Writer Dad would say the same. I have to say that, above all, I am happiest that people didn’t just stand by but spoke up. (Though respectfully.)
I have faith that it’ll wind down soon.
October 26, 2008 at 11:11 pm
Night Writer
Even though I’m commiting the just-discovered sin of focusing in on one brief part of a post for my comment, I just have to say that I’ve modified the 5 Love Languages slightly by combining Quality Time, Gift-Giving and Spoken Messages of High Value.
I’ve decided that for me, what I really like is to receive Quality Gifts of High Value. Yeah, it’s self-aggrandizing, but what are ya gonna do?
As for the larger situation described in your post, Hayden, I’m going to say that in this instance blogging is a bit like driving in traffic. While we all have a working knowledge of the rules of the road it doesn’t mean that sometime we won’t cut someone off or commit some minor violation. Most of the time when it happens it can be shrugged off with grace or perhaps an epithet, but every now and then you get someone like Rita who takes it as a personal affront and decides to drive behind you with her high-beams on for five miles!
hayden tompkins says:
Viva la information super highway!
I’m not surprised at your language of love either. It’s exactly what you are giving in your marriage workshops.
October 26, 2008 at 11:21 pm
Kool Aid
Hi Hayden, I’m here, too, from Writer Dad’s. I had to go back and re-read your original comment when all the hub-bub started because I certainly didn’t see anything other than a funny response to high school life. I certainly agree with everyone else that you handled yourself well.
I’ll also be subscribing to your blog and will be back to read more later
hayden tompkins says:
Woohoo and welcome!
It’s such a reminder of how much of our perceptions are filtered through our personal experience and bias.
October 28, 2008 at 4:36 am
Friar
@Hayden
First time visitor here. I followed the whole comment thread of that post, and it was painful to watch. It really bothered my how people like you were getting attacked for just expressing their opinion.
I commend you for taking the high road and keeping things civil. If it were me, I’d probably have blown a gasket!
I think the best thing everyone can do now is move on, and ignore the whole mess.
It’s the equivalent of a kid having a temper tantrum. The last thing you want to do is reinforce bad behavior by giving it attention.
hayden tompkins says:
I think I was more amazed than anything. People are usually so friendly and accomodating, that it seemed surreal. Someone described it as a trainwreck of a comment thread and I would have to agree.
October 28, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Kip de Moll
Wow, as the other one (I believe) who was “stepped on” in those comments, I walked away distracted by other things. Looks like I missed a dilly!
I “got” your comment clearly, BTW. It’s chill.
hayden tompkins says:
Yes, I was definitely surprised that I was not understood. It did leave me scratching my head.
Somehow I missed her strong rebuttal of your brief comment. I would agree that it is a new genre, unlike – say – writing science fiction. (Which, for a long while, was a ‘new’ genre.) The internet itself is pretty new. Anyway, I know what you meant.
October 28, 2008 at 7:08 pm
Connie
Late for the party again…what a clusterf*****. I read EVERYTHING…left me with more questions than answers! Of course, you handled yourself well you self aggrandizing wench you
Seems like “Rita” was doing the very thing she was accusing everyone else of in her post and comments to said post. Talk about some self aggrandizing(sp?) Anyways, you have a lot of new readers and that is good for you.
@ Friar– AMEN “It’s the equivalent of a kid having a temper tantrum. The last thing you want to do is reinforce bad behavior by giving it attention.”
hayden tompkins says:
LMAO, I can’t believe you wrote “clusterf****”! Though admittedly it is pretty accurate.
October 30, 2008 at 6:29 am
Steven Smith
It sounds intense. I read it. Hmm. I’m left wondering why I spent so much time reading this drama. No offense intended. It’s nice. I mean that it’s filled with niceties (is that good spelling?).
hayden tompkins says:
You’re right, it was an absolute trainwreck. But the majority of people were very kind and beautiful about the whole thing and that, I thought, was a bright spot.
October 31, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Graham Strong
Hey Hayden,
At first I thought that the whole exchange was just a ploy to underscore the premise that blogs are like high school. The remark to you did seem to come from left-field — I had to scroll back up in the comments to see what was so “offensive” about your comment that I missed. I still don’t quite understand. I thought your comment certainly added to the conversation, and probably echoed what many were thinking.
I’ve been the target of some flame wars (do people still use that term?) in my time, and I understand how personal it can feel. If you are wondering what (if anything) you did wrong, I for one do not see what you could have done differently. In fact, it is a comment I would likely make myself — though I’m not sure I would have handled the follow-ups as well as you did. I’m a little less “Namaste” and a little more “Youmustdie” about those sort of things…
(I mean that in the metaphorical and hopefully funny way, not the creepy, psychotic kind of way…)
Chalk up one more subscriber.
~Graham
hayden tompkins says:
LOL, Graham, I get you. Not creepy at all!
It would have been immediately more gratifying to demand satisfaction, but I just couldn’t bring myself to do that being as I was in ’someone else’s house’. That gave me the time I needed to think it over instead of succumbing to a knee-jerk reaction. Thanks for your astute observations!