Manliness has taken a back seat to feminism. Feminism has convinced men that a ’sensitive man’ is a man with no assertiveness.
Behold! A website dedicated to the art of manliness called, no surprise, The Art of Manliness.
Articles worth a gander, include:
They even offer a free e-book, “Guide to Being a Gentleman in 2008″.
* * * * * * * * *
If you liked this article check out Wanna Be Cool? Go get your balls back!





8 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 5, 2008 at 5:30 pm
thedailydish
Oooohhh Hayden, I LOVE THIS ONE!!
I’m tired of sensitive guy rock & Boys who are prettier than me.
Give me a sweaty burly wood chopping manly man anyday. When all hell breaks lose, who are you gonna want with you? Wuss boy extraordinaire with his whiz skilz at Halo? HELL NO!
You’re gonna want the REAL meal deal. A man who can lift 120 lbs, build a shelter, wrestle wild animals, and administer beat downs to looters. My husband is a real man and he’s my hero.
persistentillusion says:
I should send your husband the link to this comment. If that doesn’t ensure you have a wonderful night tonight, I’ll eat my shorts.
February 5, 2008 at 6:01 pm
thedailydish
Can you tell I watched Pride & Prejudice last night?
We need more real men – Mr. Darcy style men.
Just my 2 cents.
February 5, 2008 at 8:24 pm
daffy
Lol! You two make me laugh so much!
I have a wood chopping, burly man… (who tries and fails to fix heating problems) but my boy… *rolls eyes* Owns more smelly stuff than I do, has enough hair gel to run a salon for a year and spend way over an hour getting ready!
I think they call it metro sexual…
persistentillusion says:
Hey! Sometimes you want your hair a little crispy for some texture. Sometimes you just want it to hold its shape with no hard edges or angles. Sometimes you want a chunky surfer look. Sometimes you want to be a Dapper Dan Man. You would be amazed at how much you can do with an inch of hair.
Although they do have makeup for men now…
February 5, 2008 at 8:39 pm
freewheel
well… hopefully a man doesn’t have to read a book to learn how to be a man.
persistentillusion says:
Well, if they would just get around to making a video game about it, I’m sure there would be no more problem!
February 5, 2008 at 9:28 pm
thedailydish
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!
February 5, 2008 at 10:01 pm
weedivine
“Feminism has convinced men that a ’sensitive man’ is a man with no assertiveness.”
Though this may be the mainstream depiction of feminism, I seriously disagree. Most feminist scholars would say they are trying to disassociate the mandate of certain characteristics from being linked to gender- ie they think that the definition of manliness in the past has been so strict that it has paralyzed men from other characteristics that are valuable to any human. A sensitive man can certainly be assertive, but the two have been opposed historically as men have been told that to be manly they must bury their sensitivity and display only strength.
Feminists would not want a man to stop being assertive to be sensitive, all humans have the right be assertive AND sensitive- the two are not opposed inherently, only in the world we have created with gender roles. Feminists illustrate a historic reality where women and men have had to adhere to a restrictive and narrow definition of each gender role- one that could use expanding, changing and questioning so we can all be truer to who we are as individuals.
So yes, let’s please live in a world where a person (regardless of gender) can be assertive and strong, and also be able to listen and be compassionate.
persistentillusion says:
Per Wikipedia, as always, I looked up feminism and found first-wave feminism, second-wave feminism, third-wave feminism, ecofeminism, individualist feminism, post feminism, separatist feminism, radical feminism, sex positive feminism, anarcha feminism, black feminism, socialist feminism, and more.
Christina Hoff Sommers, in her 1994 book Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women, considers much of modern academic feminist theory and the feminist movement, which she says is aimed at the abolition of gender roles, to be gynocentric and misandrist.
She labels this “Gender feminism” and proposes “Equity feminism”—an ideology that aims for full civil and legal equality. She argues that while the feminists she designates as gender feminists advocate preferential treatment and portray women as victims, equity feminism provides a viable alternative form of feminism. These descriptions and her other work have caused Hoff Sommers to be described as an antifeminist by other feminists.
When you take a look at radical and separatist feminism, it is not hard to see where she is coming from.
Of course, there is always the SCUM manifesto. Valerie Solanas, the radical feminist who shot Andy Warhol in 1968, provides a famous example of misandry in her self-published SCUM Manifesto.
“As for the issue of whether or not to continue to reproduce males, it doesn’t follow that because the male, like disease, has always existed among us that he should continue to exist. When genetic control is possible — and soon it will be — it goes without saying that we should produce only whole, complete beings, not physical defects of deficiencies, including emotional deficiencies, such as maleness. Just as the deliberate production of blind people would be highly immoral, so would be the deliberate production of emotional cripples.”
It looks as if there is some basis to the perception that feminism is misadrist.
February 6, 2008 at 6:21 pm
weedivine
Feminism as misandrist is one way to choose to look at feminsim as a movement. Personally, I subscribe to a feminist way of thought that more closely aligns with equality- and most major thought in feminism aligns with.
Authors like Naomi Wolf, Bell Hooks, Audre Lourde, and many other notables make the salient point that feminism is a movement which is not perfect (thus the critiques within the community) but is absolutely valuable for its foundational belief that humans be equal.
So if you choose to label all feminism as wanting to rid the world of males, or equate it with emasculation, you certainly have people who call themselves feminist, that support your opinions. I think it is valuable though, to state that this is the definition of feminism that you are using- and perhaps mention that there are many other (and in my opinion, salient and relevant) forms of feminist thought out there.
February 6, 2008 at 6:59 pm
persistentillusion
A very real basis for the presumption that feminism has changed male-female interactions can be found on a simple date. (Doesn’t even have to be misandrist.)
I know men who, thinking they are being polite, have been eviscerated by a woman for opening their car door or pulling out their chair.
Not all women do that, and not all feminists believe that I assume, however, there is a very real de-masculation that has occurred for men in America.
I think the fact that many men are afraid of taking the initiative in many things is a indication of this.